Why Jamie Why?I've had all of today to calm down, but really, that was just haunting. I actually couldn't get to sleep last night. I love Jamie Moyer, but that was probably the least clutch thing I've ever seen. I mean I never thought this would be a sweep (as limitlessly cool as that would be), and if the Dodgers pulled out a squeaker or two, I'd be disappointed and nervous but basically okay. But with a 2-0 lead, you can't go out in Game 3 and just let the other team pound you and get back their confidence.
Or maybe intangibles like "confidence" are overrated, and the Phils just had a bad night and they'll get their act together tonight and everything will be fine. That sounds reasonable too. Who can say? I still believe, and so should you.
Meanwhile, I defy anyone to convince me that Joe Buck and Tim McCarver – and by extension, Fox – aren’t openly rooting for the Dodgers. I understand that Fox would much prefer a Dodgers/Red Sox World Series (as flawed as that logic may be), but is it necessary to be so brazenly obvious about it? The vast majority of their mostly inane babbling revolved around the Dodgers and particularly Manny Ramirez, who they felt the need to talk about at every possible free moment, even, at one point, when he had already flied out to center three batters earlier. (It wouldn’t be quite so bad if they and the rest of the national media liked Manny for the right reasons – i.e. he’s arguably the greatest hitter on the planet right now – but they only love him because despite all his talent he has the mentality and maturity of a four year old, making him suddenly do and say crazy things that must be entertaining if you’re either a bored sportswriter, a bored sportscaster, or a random TV viewer who happened to tune in and has no serious interest in the game and just wants to see someone do something wacky.) They spent a great deal of time talking about a Dodgers/Red Sox World Series as if it was a foregone conclusion, reducing the Phillies to a kind of baseball equivalent of the Washington Generals - a team that was on the field solely to give up home runs to Manny Ramirez, or to be thrown at by headhunting Dodger pitchers. (I know that I was losing sleep over whether the Dodgers pitchers had the respect of the Dodgers batters, and I thank Buck and McCarver for mentioning 40 times that this was no longer an issue.)
At one point Buck spent like four minutes telling us that Tanyon Sturtze and Mark Sweeney, two injured Dodgers who aren’t on the active roster, travel with the team and hang out in the locker room to keep the team “loose”, a story so wildly pointless and uninteresting that I now wonder if maybe I actually dreamt it. Buck even made a point to mention that Sturtze is a former Yankee, a detail that gives the story multiple, almost Joycean levels of irrelevance.
They also found tenuous excuses to mention Vin Scully and Don Drysdale - no mentions of Harry Kalas or Steve Carlton that I remember. None of those four people have much to do with the action on the field, but my point is that there's such a thing as equal time. I don't know, I mean I was at Game 1, and I watched Game 2 in a bar with the sound down, so maybe they talked more about the Phillies during those games. And look, I'll freely admit that the Phils had a crappy night, had no answers for Kuroda, and weren't at that particular moment really worth talking about, but really, they had a 2-0 lead in the series! Buck and McCarver were acting like the Dodgers were about to clinch the whole thing! I know what I heard and if I hear more of it tonight I will stab somebody.
Also: Dodgers fans, how DARE you leave early during the NLCS with your team up five runs? I hate you people.
Also also: Baseball players are bunch of posturing crybaby wusses. That's really all I have to say about the brawl. Shut up and play ball, children.
Enough about Game 3. It's in the past, and all that matters is tonight. It's going to be okay. You've trusted them this far, right?
Labels: NLCS, tv